Comparing AI HATs for Pi 5: performance, compatibility, and what to buy for dev testing

Cut the setup time: which AI HAT actually works for Pi 5 dev testing?

If you’re a developer tired of mismatched drivers, flaky demos, and getting a different result in production than on your desk — this guide is for you. In 2026 the Raspberry Pi 5 is a capable edge platform, but the choice of AI accelerator (and the maturity of its driver stack and community) makes or breaks developer productivity. Below I compare the practical options — what runs on Pi 5, what works reliably, and what to buy for rapid dev and benchmarking.

What changed in 2024–2026 and why it matters now

In the last 18–24 months edge inference moved from experiments to engineering. Key trends driving choices in 2026:

• Framework convergence around ONNX & ONNX Runtime — many vendors now provide ONNX backends, making switching accelerators easier at the model level.
• More mature ARM builds for device runtimes (Edge TPU, OpenVINO, ONNX Runtime) — fewer cross-compilation hacks for Pi 5 ARM64.
• Pi 5’s improved I/O (PCIe/USB) usage — PCIe-capable accelerators and USB3 devices get closer to their theoretical throughput on Pi 5 than they could on earlier Pis.
• Rise of camera+AI modules (Luxonis/OAK-style) that offload pre-processing and depth to the device, simplifying Pi-side code.

How I’ll compare HATs and accelerators (what matters to devs)

Rather than an abstract spec sheet, I evaluate devices on developer-focused criteria:

• Model support — what precision and ops are supported (int8, int16, fp16, fp32) and which frameworks are first-class citizens.
• Driver maturity — ease of install, stability on ARM64 Linux, and whether CI-friendly headless usage is supported (CI-friendly headless usage).
• Community & docs — examples, reproducible demos, and active issue trackers.
• Price/perf — real-world throughput and latency per dollar for common dev models (MobileNet/ResNet/YOLO/TinyML workloads).
• Physical fit for Pi 5 — GPIO HAT vs USB vs PCIe/M.2 and how each maps to Pi 5 I/O.

Accelerator categories you’ll actually buy (with representative examples)

Below I break devices into practical buckets. For each I list strengths, weaknesses, and the dev scenario where it wins.

1) Edge TPU (Google Coral) — USB or M.2/PCIe

Representative: Coral USB Accelerator, Coral M.2 Accelerator (Edge TPU)

• Best for: High-throughput int8 models (MobileNet, EfficientNet-lite, quantized object detection).
• Model support: TFLite quantized models (int8). Strong TFLite/Edge TPU tooling; more recent ONNX->TFLite toolchains are stable by 2026.
• Driver maturity: Very good — the Edge TPU runtime and pycoral provide a reliable experience on Pi 5; M.2/PCIe card setups work well with the Pi 5 PCIe improvements (adapter required for M.2).
• Community & docs: Active official examples and a big community. Many CI examples for quantization and benchmarking.
• Price/perf: Excellent for int8 models; among the best inferences/sec per dollar for MobileNet-class models.
• Drawbacks: Limited to quantized ops; unsupported ops must be fallback to CPU, hurting end-to-end latency for mixed-models.

2) Intel Movidius lineage & DepthAI (Myriad X sockets in OAK devices)

Representative: Intel Neural Compute Stick lineage (used in many depth devices), Luxonis OAK-D family (camera+NPU).

• Best for: Camera-first dev workflows needing onboard pre-processing and depth, or flexible model formats via OpenVINO.
• Model support: Good OpenVINO support; supports common ops and mixed precision. OAK/D devices include pre-integrations for common networks.
• Driver maturity: Solid, though the tooling has had periods of fragmentation in the past — by 2026 the DepthAI stack and OpenVINO ARM builds are widely usable on Pi 5.
• Community & docs: DepthAI and Luxonis provide developer-focused SDKs, with many camera demos and ROS integrations.
• Price/perf: Great if you need camera + inference. Higher cost than simple USB TPUs but saves engineering time for vision pipelines.
• Drawbacks: Usually USB-connected; USB3 bandwidth and host CPU still matter for high-rate camera feeds.

3) Kendryte K2/K510 (Sipeed / Seeed style) — GPIO HATs

Representative: Kendryte-based AI HATs and tinyML modules

• Best for: TinyML prototypes, ultra-low-power on-device tasks, and teaching/embedded tests where int8/8-bit/low-accuracy is acceptable.
• Model support: Tiny convolutional networks out of the box (Kendryte toolchain, support for simple quantized models).
• Driver maturity: Lightweight and stable; often simply exposes a serial/USB or I2C interface with a small SDK. Very low friction to get started.
• Community & docs: Active hobbyist communities; however enterprise-level examples are fewer.
• Price/perf: Best-in-class price for very small workloads. Not a substitute for high-accuracy or large models.
• Drawbacks: Extremely constrained model size and op support. Not suitable for ResNet/Yolo sized networks.

4) FPGA or customizable accelerator HATs (Xilinx/Intel FPGA boards, custom boards)

Representative: PYNQ-compatible boards, small FPGA mezzanine HATs

• Best for: Custom ops, experimenters needing deterministic latencies, and teams willing to invest in hardware acceleration pipelines.
• Model support: Depends: you compile kernels; good for fixed networks (quantized) and pipelined workloads.
• Driver maturity: More involved — toolchains (Vivado/Vitis/SDAccel) are heavier and cross-compilation is slower; however the PYNQ ecosystem has simplified many workflows.
• Community & docs: Strong in academic and enterprise projects; less plug-and-play than Coral/OAK.
• Price/perf: Can be excellent for production but high dev cost for proofs-of-concept.
• Drawbacks: Long ramp for developers; not ideal for quick iteration.

Pi 5 hardware fit: USB vs PCIe vs HAT — what you actually need

Raspberry Pi 5 gives you more flexibility than Pi 4 did. Pick the interface based on your development priorities:

• USB (plug-and-play) — Coral USB, OAK-D (USB). Best for fast setup, portable dev benches, and camera devices.
• M.2 / PCIe (through adapter) — Coral M.2; used when bandwidth matters and you want lower latency for sustained throughput. The Pi 5 PCIe improvements make this compelling.
• GPIO HATs — Kendryte/Sipeed HATs. Best for low-power scenarios where you don’t need large models.

Sample dev checklist: things to validate before buying

1. Does the accelerator support the precision your models use (int8, fp16, fp32)?
2. Are there ARM64 Pi 5-friendly runtimes and prebuilt packages?
3. Is conversion tooling documented (TFLite, ONNX -> vendor format)?
4. Are there example pipelines that match your use case (classification, object detection, segmentation)?
5. How does the device behave in headless CI or Docker containers?
6. Power and thermal needs — can your Pi 5 enclosure and power supply handle it under load?
7. Is the SDK licensed in a way that fits your product roadmap (open source vs proprietary)?

Quick hands-on: 10-minute smoke test on Pi 5

Before you commit, do this sanity test. It proves driver, model conversion, and runtime chain.

1) Verify the device is visible

Run:

lsusb
lspci -nnk | grep -A3 -i <vendor-or-device>

Look for the vendor string (Coral, Myriad, DepthAI). If using an M.2 card with an adapter, confirm the PCIe device shows in lspci.

2) Install the runtime (Edge TPU example)

On Pi 5 (ARM64) the command set is similar to previous Raspberry Pi installs; check the vendor docs for up-to-date repos. Example for Edge TPU:

sudo apt update
sudo apt install python3-pip
python3 -m pip install --upgrade pip
python3 -m pip install pycoral

Then run a small Python test to ensure the device delegate loads. Example (pycoral helper):

from pycoral.utils.edgetpu import make_interpreter
from pycoral.adapters import classify
from pycoral.utils.dataset import read_label_file

interpreter = make_interpreter('mobilenet_v2_1.0_224_inat_bird_quant_edgetpu.tflite')
interpreter.allocate_tensors()
# run a sample input buffer and get classes (details in pycoral docs)

3) Run a throughput test

Use a tiny benchmark: infer a batch of 1000 images and measure time. Repeat between accelerator and CPU fallback. This shows real-world speedups.

Real-world recommendations (what to buy for dev testing)

Context: these picks prioritize developer velocity: fast setup, reproducible examples, and reliable driver stacks on Pi 5.

Best all-round dev HAT: Coral USB Accelerator (or Coral M.2 + adapter)

Why: Great documentation, predictable quantized performance, and large community. If you want sustained throughput and lower latency in multi-threaded workloads, prefer the M.2/PCIe Edge TPU (use an adapter for Pi 5). For immediate plug-and-play and portability, USB is simplest.

Best for camera-first dev (depth + inference): OAK (Luxonis)

Why: Bundles a trained vision stack and on-device inference. You get depth + object detection with less Pi CPU load. This is a time-saver for prototyping robotics, AR, or surveillance demos.

Best low-cost tinyML dev HAT: Kendryte-based HATs (Sipeed/Seeed)

Why: Extremely cheap to iterate with and suitable for low-power sensor prototypes. If your models are small (keyword spotting, basic vision), this reduces cost and power headaches.

When to skip a HAT and use a Jetson or SBC instead

If your workflows require flexible FP16/FP32 models (larger transformers, high-accuracy segmentation) or you need CUDA support for training-adjacent tasks, consider an NVIDIA Jetson Orin/Nano as an alternative platform — they are not HATs but avoid heavy model conversion and quantization. For broader edge stacks and testbeds, see recommendations on edge containers and low-latency architectures.

Benchmarks and expected behavior (practical figures)

Benchmarks vary by model and precision; below are typical 2026-era expectations for a Pi 5 testbed, normalized to a 224x224 MobileNet-like workload:

• Edge TPU (M.2/USB): 50–200 inferences/sec on quantized MobileNet variants depending on model size and I/O (M.2 tends toward the higher end).
• DepthAI / Myriad family: Comparable to Edge TPU for some networks; advantage if you need camera preprocessing and depth with fewer Pi-side steps.
• Kendryte (K210/K510): 5–50 inferences/sec for very small networks; excellent power efficiency but limited accuracy and model complexity.
• FPGA HAT: Wide range; properly configured FPGA pipelines can beat general-purpose NPUs for specific workloads, but expect higher dev time.

Numbers are illustrative: always run the 10-minute smoke test described above with your own models and dataset to validate.

Driver and CI tips — make tests reproducible

• Use containerized runtimes where possible. Vendors increasingly publish Docker manifests for ARM64 Pi images.
• Pin runtime versions in CI; runtime contracts sometimes change (e.g., edge libraries and ONNX Runtime providers). See the tool sprawl audit for tips on locking dependencies.
• Automate model conversion and quantization with a pipeline (ONNX -> TFLite/EdgeTPU -> test harness) so developers get deterministic artifacts.
• Measure power draw during benchmarks to estimate battery deployments and thermal throttling on Pi 5 — reference field kit recommendations at Gear & Field Review.

Future-proofing (2026 and beyond)

Edge stacks continue to converge on ONNX and portable delegates. That matters because:

• ONNX-backed workflows reduce lock-in: you can re-target devices faster.
• Expect more hybrid runtimes that auto-fallback unsupported ops to CPU or another accelerator.
• Community toolchains will provide end-to-end reproducible conversion and benchmarking for Pi 5 class devices — this lowers dev friction for productionizing PoCs.

Final buying matrix — pick by developer need

• Rapid model dev and benchmarking: Coral USB (or M.2 if you need sustained throughput)
• Vision with depth & fewer Pi changes: OAK-D / DepthAI devices
• Lowest cost for tinyML experiments: Kendryte K2/K510 HATs
• Custom ops / production pipelines: FPGA HAT, if you can absorb the longer dev cycle
• Need FP16/FP32 flexibility: Consider moving to a Jetson-class SBC instead of an attached HAT

Actionable next steps — a 4-step plan for dev testing

1. Decide your target model precision (int8 vs fp16/fp32).
2. Buy the representative device from the recommended pick above (USB Coral or OAK-D for vision).
3. Run the 10-minute smoke test and throughput benchmark with a canonical model (MobileNet) and your model.
4. Automate conversion + benchmark in CI and pin runtime versions.

Parting advice for teams

Do not choose an accelerator based only on peak theoretical TOPS. Instead, prioritize the combination of driver maturity, model conversion tooling, and community examples. For most Pi 5 dev workflows in 2026, that means Coral Edge TPU (USB or M.2) or a DepthAI device for camera work — they hit the best balance of speed, stability, and documentation for rapid iteration.

Call to action

Ready to bench your models on Pi 5? Download our Pi 5 accelerator test harness (includes container manifests and a ready-made conversion pipeline) and run the 10-minute smoke test. If you want personalized help picking an accelerator for your stack, reach out with your model type and latency/ power targets — we’ll recommend a short list and a test plan you can run in a day.

Related Reading

• Edge Containers & Low-Latency Architectures for Cloud Testbeds — Evolution and Advanced Strategies (2026)
• Edge‑First Developer Experience in 2026: Shipping Interactive Apps with Composer Patterns and Cost‑Aware Observability
• Field Kits & Edge Tools for Modern Newsrooms (2026)
• Gear & Field Review 2026: Portable Power, Labeling and Live‑Sell Kits for Market Makers
• Design a Subscription Product Like Goalhanger: A Creator Revenue Template
• Deepfake Drama: How Pubs Can Avoid Reputation Attacks and Impersonations
• VR Clubhouses and the Future of Fan Spaces: Lessons from Meta’s Workrooms Shutdown
• Preparing Quantum Workloads for a World Starved for Wafers
• If Studios Can Merge, So Can Sports Media: What Banijay-All3 Moves Mean for Cricket Programming